logo
ResearchBunny Logo
Work Engagement and Well-being Study (SWELL): a randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating the effects of mindfulness versus light physical exercise at work

Medicine and Health

Work Engagement and Well-being Study (SWELL): a randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating the effects of mindfulness versus light physical exercise at work

M. Vainre, T. Dalgleish, et al.

Mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) are increasingly delivered online at work. This pragmatic randomised feasibility trial compared a 4‑week self-guided MBP to a light physical exercise programme in 241 employees, finding high acceptability but negligible benefits of MBP over exercise for work performance, while both improved mental health. Research conducted by authors present in the <Authors> tag (Maris Vainre, Tim Dalgleish, Peter Watson, Christina Haag, Quentin Dercon, Julieta Galante, Caitlin Hitchcock).

00:00
00:00
~3 min • Beginner • English
Abstract
Background: Mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) are increasingly offered at work, often in online self-guided format, but evidence for effects on work performance (WP) is inconsistent. Objective: This pragmatic randomised controlled feasibility trial assessed procedural uncertainties, intervention acceptability and preliminary effect sizes of an MBP on WP relative to an alternative intervention. Methods: 241 employees from eight employers were randomised (1:1) to a 4-week, self-guided, online MBP or a light physical exercise programme (LE; active control). Feasibility and acceptability measures were primary; WP at postintervention (PostInt) was the primary outcome for preliminary effect size assessment. Secondary outcomes included mental health (MH) and cognitive processes hypothesised to be targeted by the MBP. Outcomes were collected at baseline, PostInt and 12-week follow-up (12wFUP). Prospective protocol: NCT04631302. Findings: 87% of randomised participants started the course; acceptability was high. Retention rates were typical for online trials (64% PostInt; 30% 12wFUP). MBP versus LE offered negligible benefits for WP (PostInt d=0.06, 95% CI −0.19 to 0.32; 12wFUP d=0.02, 95% CI −0.30 to 0.26). Both interventions improved MH outcomes (within-arm ds ≈ −0.40 to 0.58); between-group differences were small (ds ≈ −0.09 to 0.04). Conclusion: The trial is feasible and interventions are acceptable. Results provide little support for a later phase trial comparing an MBP to a light exercise control; procedural challenges are summarised to inform future trials. Clinical implications: MBPs are unlikely to improve WP relative to light physical exercise. Although the MBP improved MH, other active interventions may be similarly efficacious. Trial registration: NCT04631302.
Publisher
BMJ Mental Health
Published On
Feb 28, 2024
Authors
Maris Vainre, Tim Dalgleish, Peter Watson, Christina Haag, Quentin Dercon, Julieta Galante, Caitlin Hitchcock
Tags
mindfulness-based programmes
work performance
online self-guided intervention
feasibility randomised trial
light physical exercise control
mental health outcomes
pragmatic RCT
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny