logo
ResearchBunny Logo
Two conceptions of consciousness and why only the neo-Aristotelian one enables us to construct evolutionary explanations

Psychology

Two conceptions of consciousness and why only the neo-Aristotelian one enables us to construct evolutionary explanations

H. Smit and P. Hacker

Discover how the clash between Cartesian and neo-Aristotelian views of the mind can impact our understanding of consciousness and its evolutionary roots. This intriguing research by Harry Smit and Peter Hacker uncovers the potential of integrated evolutionary theory with a fresh perspective on intellect and will.

00:00
00:00
Playback language: English
Abstract
This paper contrasts Cartesian and neo-Aristotelian conceptions of mind, arguing that only the latter coherently integrates with evolutionary theory. The Cartesian dualism, separating mind and body, creates an unbridgeable gap between subjective experience and neural activity, hindering evolutionary explanations. The neo-Aristotelian view, defining the mind as the capacities of intellect and will, extended by viewing organisms as open thermodynamic systems with heredity, offers a framework for explaining consciousness' evolution.
Publisher
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published On
Sep 15, 2020
Authors
Harry Smit, Peter Hacker
Tags
Cartesian dualism
neo-Aristotelian
evolutionary theory
consciousness
mind-body integration
subjective experience
neural activity
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny