logo
ResearchBunny Logo
The experiences of adult patients, families, and healthcare professionals of CPR decision-making conversations in the United Kingdom: A qualitative systematic review

Medicine and Health

The experiences of adult patients, families, and healthcare professionals of CPR decision-making conversations in the United Kingdom: A qualitative systematic review

M. Hartanto, G. Moore, et al.

This systematic review explores the crucial conversations surrounding CPR decision-making in the UK, highlighting the diverse experiences of patients, families, and healthcare professionals. Conducted by a team including Michelle Hartanto, Gavin Moore, Timothy Robbins, Risheka Suthantirakumar, and Anne-Marie Slowther, the findings underscore the need for improved communication strategies in critical care settings.

00:00
00:00
~3 min • Beginner • English
Abstract
Aim: To conduct a qualitative systematic review on the experiences of patients, families, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) of CPR decisionmaking conversations in the United Kingdom (UK). Methods: The databases PubMed, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, and PsycInfo were searched. Studies published from 1 January 2012 describing experiences of CPR decision-making conversations in the UK were included. Included studies were critically appraised using the CASP tool. Thematic synthesis was conducted. Results: From 684 papers identified, ten studies were included. Four key themes were identified: (i) Initiation of conversations -Key prompts for the discussion included clinical deterioration and poor prognosis. There are different perspectives about who should initiate conversations. (ii) Involvement of patients and families -HCPs were reluctant to involve patients who they thought would become distressed by the conversation, while patients varied in their desire to be involved. Patients wanted family support while HCPs viewed families as potential sources of conflict. (iii) Influences on the content of conversations -Location, context, HCPs' attitudes and emotions, and uncertainty of prognosis influenced the content of conversations. (iv) Conversation outcomes -Range of outcomes included emotional distress, sense of relief and value, disagreements, and incomplete conversations.Conclusions: There is inconsistency in how these conversations occur, patients' desire to be involved, and between patients' and HCPs' views on the role of families in these conversations. CPR discussions raise ethical challenges for HCPs. HCPs need training and pastoral support in conducting CPR discussions. Patients and families need education on CPR recommendations and support after discussions.
Publisher
Resuscitation Plus
Published On
Jan 01, 2023
Authors
Michelle Hartanto, Gavin Moore, Timothy Robbins, Risheka Suthantirakumar, Anne-Marie Slowther
Tags
CPR
decision-making
patient experience
family involvement
healthcare professionals
communication
qualitative review
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny