This study uses sentiment, emotion, discourse, and timeline analyses to examine how the *New York Times* represented pandemic-induced unemployment in 2020. The results show significantly more positive than negative sentiment, with "trust" and "anticipation" as the dominant emotions. Discourse analysis links these emotional dynamics to the pandemic's evolution, policy responses, and protests against racial inequality.
Publisher
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Published On
Jun 28, 2024
Authors
Lingli Yu, Ling Yang
Tags
sentiment analysis
unemployment
pandemic
New York Times
emotions
discourse analysis
racial inequality
Related Publications
Explore these studies to deepen your understanding of the subject.
