
Agriculture
Effects of solid oxygen fertilizers and biochars on nitrous oxide production from agricultural soils in Florida
T. Bera, K. S. Inglett, et al.
Discover how solid oxygen fertilizers and biochars can significantly reduce nitrous oxide emissions in Florida's agricultural soils! This groundbreaking research by Tanumoy Bera, Kanika S. Inglett, and Guodong D. Liu unveils the potential strategies for sustainable farming practices.
~3 min • Beginner • English
Introduction
Nitrous oxide (N₂O) is a potent, long-lived greenhouse gas with a global warming potential 298 times greater than CO₂ and has increased in the atmosphere from ~270 to 330 ppb. Agricultural soils are major sources of N₂O, especially under hypoxic/anaerobic conditions that promote heterotrophic denitrification. Factors such as soil aeration, moisture from heavy rainfall or flooding, available carbon and nitrogen, temperature, and pH regulate N₂O production. In Florida, extreme rains and hurricanes frequently cause waterlogging that elevates N₂O emissions and reduces nitrogen-use efficiency, while vegetable production commonly receives substantial N fertilization (e.g., ~224 kg N ha⁻¹). Biochar amendments have variably reduced N₂O in prior studies, depending on biochar and soil properties. Solid oxygen fertilizers (SOFs; calcium peroxide, magnesium peroxide) can alleviate hypoxia in flooded soils by releasing oxygen, potentially suppressing denitrification-driven N₂O formation. The objective was to evaluate how SOFs and biochars affect N₂O production and mineral N dynamics in two contrasting Florida agricultural soils (mineral, organic) with and without N fertilization under flooded, short-term laboratory incubation.
Literature Review
Prior work attributes soil N₂O emissions primarily to denitrification, with episodic increases after precipitation and under low redox potential. Biochar has been studied for soil improvement and C sequestration, showing variable effects on N₂O emissions across soils and biochar types, influenced by biochar chemistry (volatile matter, ash content), soil texture, C/N interactions, and fertilizer form. Reviews and meta-analyses (e.g., Cayuela et al.) propose both biotic and abiotic mechanisms for biochar’s mitigation of N₂O, but outcomes remain inconsistent. SOFs (e.g., MgO₂, CaO₂) have been used to alleviate plant hypoxic stress in flooded conditions by increasing redox potential via oxygen release; however, their effect on soil anoxia and N₂O suppression has been little studied.
Methodology
Two Florida agricultural soils were used: a mineral soil (Kanapaha fine sand; 1.2% organic C) and an organic soil (Pahokee Muck; 33.9% organic C). Initial soil properties are reported (texture, pH, CEC, nutrients). Biochars were produced from corn residues (CB) and pine bark (PB) via slow pyrolysis: feedstocks chopped (~2 cm), dried, heated at 10 °C min⁻¹ to 550 °C, held 4 h, cooled, oven-dried (65 °C), crushed, sieved (2 mm). Biochar properties (pH 1:10, total C/N/P, proximate analysis) were characterized. SOFs were calcium peroxide (CaO₂; solubility 1.65 g L⁻¹, pH of 1% suspension 11.7) and magnesium peroxide (MgO₂; solubility 86 mg L⁻¹, pH 10.3). Experimental design: two simultaneous laboratory incubations (23–25 °C, March–April 2017). Treatments (per soil): S (control), S+N (224 kg N ha⁻¹ as ammonium nitrate, 33.5% N), S+CB, S+CB+N, S+PB, S+PB+N, S+N+CPO, S+N+MPO. Biochar and SOFs were applied at 0.5% w/w. Moisture was brought to 60% of maximum water holding capacity (MWHC), pre-incubated 3 d, then adjusted to 100% MWHC at experiment start; moisture was maintained throughout. Replication: 3 per treatment per soil (total 48 units; 2 soils × 8 treatments × 3 reps). Experiment 1 (N₂O): jars (473 cm³) with 100 g mineral or 50 g organic soil, loosely covered, dark incubation ~3 weeks. Gas sampling after 12 h closures at scheduled intervals: MS days 1,2,3,4,6,9,13,21; OS at 0.5,1,2,3,4,5,7,9,13,17,23. N₂O quantified by GC (Shimadzu GC-2014, ECD). Concentrations converted to rates via ideal gas law; cumulative N₂O by linear interpolation. Experiment 2 (mineral N): destructive sampling at days 1, 3, 13, and 21 (MS) or 23 (OS). Mineral N (NH₄⁺, NO₃⁻) extracted with 2 M KCl and measured on a discrete flow autoanalyzer (SEAL AQ2). Microbial biomass C and N measured at end via chloroform fumigation and 0.5 M K₂SO₄ extraction. Soil and biochar pH (soil:water 1:2; biochar:water 1:10), total C and N by dry combustion (Thermo Flash EA 1112), Mehlich-1 extractable nutrients by ICP-AES; soil texture, MWHC, and CEC by standard methods. Statistics: Completely randomized design; one-way ANOVA (SAS PROC ANOVA); mean separation by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at α=0.05.
Key Findings
- Organic soil (OS) consistently exhibited higher N₂O production rates and cumulative emissions than mineral soil (MS), except for the MS corn biochar + N (S+CB+N) treatment which produced very high emissions.
- Effect of N fertilizer: N addition increased N₂O production by ~74× in MS and ~2× in OS compared to unfertilized controls.
- Solid oxygen fertilizers (SOFs): In MS, both CaO₂ and MgO₂ with N reduced N₂O production to levels comparable to unfertilized soils, achieving 98–99% reductions relative to N-only controls. The lowest cumulative N₂O in MS was with CaO₂ + N (S+N+CPO): 51 µg N₂O kg⁻¹ soil over 21 days. In OS, CaO₂ + N reduced N₂O by ~25% relative to N-only, while MgO₂ + N did not significantly reduce emissions (S+N+MPO: 22,073 µg kg⁻¹ vs S+N: 23,757 µg kg⁻¹).
- Biochars: Corn residue biochar with N (S+CB+N) greatly increased N₂O in MS, yielding the highest cumulative emission among MS treatments (23,185 µg kg⁻¹). In OS, CB + N reduced N₂O relative to N-only. Pine bark biochar with N (S+PB+N) did not significantly change N₂O compared to N-only in either soil.
- Temporal dynamics: In OS, most treatments peaked in N₂O production within 24 h, while SOF treatments delayed peak timing and sustained lower rates. In MS, N-only and CB+N peaked around day 4; MgO₂ + N peaked around day 10; CaO₂ + N maintained low, stable rates.
- Mineral N dynamics: In MS, N-fertilized soils without SOFs had higher NH₄⁺ (50–73 mg kg⁻¹) and declining NO₃⁻ (to 19–27 mg kg⁻¹). With SOFs, NH₄⁺ was lower (6–41 mg kg⁻¹) and NO₃⁻ was maintained at higher levels (52–57 mg kg⁻¹). In OS, most treatments showed initial high NO₃⁻ (~300 mg kg⁻¹) declining to <20 mg kg⁻¹, with NH₄⁺ rising to ~100 mg kg⁻¹; CaO₂ + N uniquely maintained higher NO₃⁻ (from 501 to 225 mg kg⁻¹) across incubation.
- Microbial biomass: SOF + N treatments reduced microbial biomass C and N in both soils relative to controls; CB effects on biomass differed by soil. End-of-incubation pH increases (MS pH ~9.8–10.0 with SOFs; OS pH ~8.25–8.35) accompanied biomass reductions.
- Mechanistic insights: SOFs likely reduced N₂O by supplying O₂ via H₂O₂ decomposition, increasing redox potential and suppressing denitrification; CaO₂ outperformed MgO₂ in OS due to much higher solubility (1.65 g L⁻¹ vs 86 mg L⁻¹). CB’s volatile matter may have supplied labile C driving denitrification in MS, whereas in OS with abundant C, CB reduced N₂O likely via different soil–biochar interactions.
Discussion
The findings confirm that N fertilizer is a key driver of N₂O emissions, yet soil properties, especially organic C content and microbial biomass, determine the magnitude and temporal pattern of emissions under hypoxia. OS, rich in organic C, supported rapid and high N₂O production under saturation, peaking within a day, consistent with C-fueled heterotrophic denitrification. MS required added N and labile C (as with CB) to reach high emissions. SOFs mitigated N₂O by supplying oxygen, increasing redox potential and limiting denitrification. CaO₂’s higher solubility enabled effective O₂ release in both soils; MgO₂ was sufficient in MS but not in OS where microbial O₂ demand was greater. Maintenance of higher NO₃⁻ with SOFs indicates inhibited denitrification and potential for improved plant-available N under flooded conditions. Biochar effects were soil- and feedstock-dependent: CB + N markedly enhanced N₂O in MS, likely via added labile C from volatile matter, but reduced N₂O in OS where mechanisms may involve changes in electron flow, microbial community, or sorption; PB showed neutral effects with N in both soils. Reductions in microbial biomass with SOFs likely reflect elevated pH and exothermic dissolution. Overall, the study demonstrates that appropriately selected SOFs can suppress N₂O under hypoxia while conserving nitrate, but biochar outcomes are context-dependent.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that under hypoxic (flooded) conditions, N-fertilized mineral soils are particularly prone to large increases in N₂O emissions. Solid oxygen fertilizers effectively mitigated N₂O: both CaO₂ and MgO₂ were highly effective in mineral soil, and CaO₂ reduced N₂O in organic soil while maintaining higher nitrate levels. Biochar effects depended on soil and feedstock: corn residue biochar with N increased N₂O in mineral soil but decreased it in organic soil; pine bark biochar with N had minimal impact in both soils. Results suggest SOFs can be used to alleviate hypoxic stress, reduce N₂O emissions, and sustain plant-available NO₃⁻ in flooded agriculture. Future work should include long-term incubations and field trials across soil types and SOF rates to optimize an SOF-based strategy for grower adoption.
Limitations
- Short-term laboratory incubation; field conditions and longer-term dynamics (seasonal variability, plant uptake) were not tested.
- Only two soils (one mineral, one organic) from Florida were studied, limiting generalizability.
- Single application rate for biochars and SOFs (0.5% w/w); dose–response not evaluated.
- Potential nitrate leaching under elevated NO₃⁻ with SOFs was not assessed.
- Microbial community composition and mechanistic pathways were not directly measured; biochar mechanisms remain inferential.
- Elevated pH from SOFs and possible heat effects reduced microbial biomass; plant responses under such pH changes were not evaluated in this study.
Related Publications
Explore these studies to deepen your understanding of the subject.