This study investigates the use of "stability" in The New York Times’ coverage of China (1980-2020), using critical discourse analysis and sentiment analysis. A diachronic quantitative analysis reveals an overall negative sentiment, with positive sentiment only during the 1980s. Qualitative analysis shows negative sentiment focuses on sociopolitical and territorial issues, while positive sentiment centers on economic aspects, suggesting a US-centric, self-interested perspective.
Publisher
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published On
Oct 07, 2023
Authors
Guofeng Wang, Yilin Liu, Shengmeng Tu
Tags
stability
China
sentiment analysis
New York Times
discourse analysis
sociopolitical issues
economic aspects
Related Publications
Explore these studies to deepen your understanding of the subject.
