logo
ResearchBunny Logo
Abstract
This study investigates the online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories by analyzing a large sample of conspiracist and conventionalist comments on news websites. The researchers examined the relative importance of promoting alternative explanations versus rejecting conventional explanations. Conspiracist commenters were more likely to argue against opposing interpretations and less likely to argue in favor of their own, while conventionalists showed the opposite pattern. However, conspiracists were more likely to offer explanations. Conspiracists also expressed more mistrust and made more positive references to other conspiracy theories. They were reluctant to label their beliefs as "conspiracy theories." Conventionalist arguments tended to be more hostile. These findings suggest that the conspiracist worldview prioritizes rejecting official explanations over promoting specific alternative theories.
Publisher
Frontiers in Psychology
Published On
Jul 08, 2013
Authors
Michael J. Wood, Karen M. Douglas
Tags
9/11 conspiracy theories
online discussion
conspiracist comments
conventionalist comments
alternative explanations
mistrust
belief systems
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny