logo
ResearchBunny Logo
Tumor Microenvironment in IDH-Mutated and IDH-Wildtype Gliomas: A Comprehensive Review

Medicine and Health

Tumor Microenvironment in IDH-Mutated and IDH-Wildtype Gliomas: A Comprehensive Review

V. D. Nunno, M. Aprile, et al.

Explore the revolutionary insights into IDH-mutated and IDH-wildtype gliomas as this review delves into the nuanced tumor microenvironment. Authored by Vincenzo Di Nunno, Maria Aprile, Luca Gatto, Alessia Tosoni, Laura Ranieri, Silvia Bartolini, and Elena Franceschi, this article reveals critical differences in immune cell infiltration and metabolic reprogramming that impact treatment strategies.... show more
Introduction

Gliomas are the most common primary CNS tumors, with an incidence of ~6 per 100,000 annually. Traditional histology has been complemented and reshaped by molecular diagnostics in the 2021 WHO CNS5 classification, which incorporates markers such as IDH1/2 mutation, 1p/19q codeletion, ATRX status, TERT promoter mutation, EGFR amplification, and chromosome +7/−10. IDH mutation status is a major prognostic determinant: IDH-mutated gliomas generally have better outcomes, further improved with 1p/19q codeletion. Oligodendrogliomas and astrocytomas differ in morphology, genetics, and tumor microenvironment (TME) composition, which likely underlies differences in behavior and outcomes. This review examines the TME in IDH-mutated and IDH-wildtype gliomas, highlighting immune, stromal, and neuronal interactions and therapeutic implications.

Literature Review

IDH-mutated gliomas: These tumors typically show lower overall immune infiltration than IDH-wildtype counterparts. Myeloid cells (microglia and macrophages) dominate the immune infiltrate, with plastic polarization across an M1–M2 spectrum; in IDH-mutant settings, a lower proportion of tumor-associated microglia/macrophages and a tendency toward M1 polarization are noted compared with IDH-wildtype GBM. Quantitatively, myeloid cells comprise ~15–30% of low-grade glioma tissue versus ~10–15% in non-neoplastic brain. Single-cell data indicate that macrophage infiltration (more than microglia) increases with grade. IDH-mutant astrocytoma grade 4 has fewer TAMs than IDH-wildtype GBM. Adaptive immunity is reduced: fewer TILs, reduced PD-L1 expression, and diminished IFN-γ signatures and CD8+ T cells. The oncometabolite 2-HG suppresses T-cell recruitment by lowering CXCL9/10, impairs TCR signaling in CD8+/CD4+ T cells via uptake through dicarboxylate transporters, and contributes to immune quiescence. Immune gene profiling (TCGA) delineates LGG subtypes (Im1–Im3) differing in lymphocyte content, macrophage phenotype, checkpoint expression, genetics, and outcomes; Im1 and Im2 are enriched for IDH1 mutation and lower immune infiltrate. Angiogenesis and metabolism: 2-HG activates EGLN prolyl-hydroxylases, suppressing HIF1α, thereby inhibiting angiogenesis and the glycolytic switch. IDH-wildtype gliomas exhibit more glycolytic, hypoxic, and acidic TMEs. Within IDH-mutant tumors, astrocytomas may acquire glycolytic features more than oligodendrogliomas, aligning with worse outcomes. Neuronal and glial interactions: Data on neuron–tumor interactions in IDH-mutant gliomas are limited; glutamate-mediated hyperexcitability likely contributes to growth and invasion, but most evidence derives from high-grade gliomas. Astrocytoma vs oligodendroglioma TME: In IDH-mutant LGGs, astrocytomas show a predominant macrophage signature, while oligodendrogliomas show a microglia signature. Macrophage signatures (CD163, TGF-β1, F13A1) are associated with higher grade, angiogenesis, and BBB changes; microglia signatures include CX3CR1, P2RY12, P2RY13. Astrocytomas tend to have more immunosuppressive lymphocyte profiles (higher PD-1+ CD8+ T cells, TIM-3+ CD4+ T cells, and Tregs) than oligodendrogliomas. 1p/19q codeletion is associated with lower immune infiltration and checkpoint gene expression (possible contribution of genes on 1p/19q such as TGFB1, JAK1, CSF1). Tumor network biology (e.g., GAP43-driven microtubes) supports invasiveness; 1p/19q codeletion correlates with fewer microtubes and interconnections. Pilocytic astrocytoma (PA): Grade 1 PAs, often MAPK/BRAF-altered (e.g., KIAA1549–BRAF), have distinct microenvironments; GBMs harbor more perivascular CD8+ cells, NKs, and macrophages than PAs, while some PA studies reveal bZIP TFs as positive immune regulators. Comparative data between PAs and IDH-mutants remain sparse. IDH-wildtype gliomas/GBM: GBM displays profound intra/inter-tumoral heterogeneity, glioma stem cells (GSCs), and extensive TME crosstalk via gap junctions, extracellular vesicles, nanotubes/microtubes, paracrine factors, and neuron–tumor synapses. AMPA-type glutamate receptors on glioma cells mediate synaptic currents, promoting invasion. Paracrine mediators (e.g., BDNF, GRP78, neuroligin-3 via ADAM10 cleavage) stimulate PI3K-mTOR signaling and growth. GBM exRNA cargo (miRNAs like miR-10b, tRNA/Y RNA fragments) can influence proliferation, invasion, and transcriptional programs (e.g., E2F1). TAMs constitute ~30–50% of GBM mass; bone marrow-derived macrophages increase with grade and correlate with worse outcomes. BBB disruption plus chemokines/cytokines (CCL2, CCL7, GDNF, CSF-1, GM-CSF, HGF, SDF-1) recruit myeloid cells; neutrophils and mast cells also contribute. Immune escape involves TGFβ2-driven T-cell exhaustion, tumor FasL and PD-L1, and Sox2/Oct4-mediated suppression of Th1 chemokines (CCL5, CXCL9/10/11), promotion of Tregs, and M2-like polarization via IL-6/IL-8. PGE2 is abundant and pro-tumorigenic; COX inhibition shows anti-proliferative/migratory effects in vitro, though clinical benefit remains unproven. GSCs within perivascular niches can differentiate toward endothelial/pericyte lineages and respond to hypoxia with VEGF; astrocytes fuel angiogenesis and may undergo neoplastic transformation; oligodendrocytes may exert inhibitory effects via WNT pathway suppression. Genetic context: Oligodendroglioma (IDH-mut, 1p/19q codeleted) often harbors TERT promoter (≈96%), CIC (≈62%), FUBP1 (≈29%), NOTCH1 (≈31%); astrocytoma (IDH-mut, non-codeleted) frequently exhibits ATRX loss (≈87%), TP53 (≈94%), CDKN2A/2B homozygous deletion (≈10%); high-grade astrocytomas may show PDGFRA amplification and PI3K mutations. IDH-wildtype GBM often shows TERT promoter mutation (≈70%), EGFR amplification (≈40%), and +7/−10 signature; H3-altered diffuse midline gliomas (H3K27-altered) and EZHIP represent distinct IDH-wildtype entities. Clinical outcomes: Among IDH-mutants, oligodendroglioma has median OS ~17 years (grade 2) and ~11 years (grade 3), versus ~8–9 years for IDH-mutant non-codeleted astrocytoma. Non-canonical IDH mutations (e.g., IDH2, non-R132H) may confer longer survival than canonical IDH1 R132H. Differences summary: IDH-wildtype tumors feature higher immune infiltration, macrophage predominance, angiogenesis, glycolytic/hypoxic/acidity traits, extensive neuron/glia/stem interactions; IDH-mutant tumors are more immune-quiescent with 2-HG-mediated T-cell suppression and anti-angiogenic effects, and within IDH-mutants, astrocytomas tend toward more immunosuppressive lymphocyte signatures than oligodendrogliomas. Future perspectives: Targeted therapies (e.g., BRAF/NTRK inhibitors; FGFR inhibitors such as infigratinib, pemigatinib; regorafenib) show promise in subsets. Targeting neuron–glioma synapses (AMPA antagonists like talampanel, perampanel) is under study. Despite impressive results in other cancers, checkpoint inhibitors have not yet improved outcomes in LGG/HGG (e.g., CheckMate548 negative); ongoing trials explore combinations (LAG3, IDO1). PARP inhibitors combinations (e.g., olaparib + pembrolizumab + temozolomide; niraparib) are under investigation. MEK inhibition (selumetinib) has activity in pediatric NF1/BRAF-altered gliomas. In H3-altered IDH-wt gliomas, DRD2/ClpP-targeting agents show early signals. Novel targets include CD161 (KLRB1). Cell therapies such as CAR-T/M (targets: B7-H3, EGFRvIII, HER2, IL13Rα2, GD2) are progressing, with early GD2 CAR-T success in H3K27M gliomas. Vaccines (mutant IDH1 peptide; dendritic cell vaccines like DCVax-L; SurVaxM; DSP-7888) and TME-targeting cytokines (e.g., L19TNF, SDF-1 blockade with olaptesed) are being explored. Gene/cell-based cytokine delivery (e.g., Tie2-monocyte IFN-α delivery; tamferon) and anti-angiogenic combinations (bevacizumab; apatinib) are under clinical evaluation.

Methodology
Key Findings
  • IDH mutation status strongly influences TME and prognosis: IDH-mutant gliomas show lower immune infiltration and an immune-quiescent phenotype compared to IDH-wildtype.
  • Myeloid composition and grade: Myeloid cells in LGG constitute ~15–30% of tumor vs ~10–15% in non-neoplastic brain; blood-derived macrophages increase with grade and correlate with worse survival; GBM/TAMs can represent ~30–50% of tumor mass.
  • IDH-mutant immune features: Fewer TILs, reduced PD-L1, decreased IFN-γ/CD8 signatures; 2-HG impairs chemokine (CXCL9/10) expression and TCR signaling in T cells, inhibiting effector function; 2-HG stimulates EGLN, suppressing HIF1α and angiogenesis.
  • Subtype-specific myeloid signatures: Astrocytomas exhibit macrophage signatures (CD163, TGF-β1, F13A1) linked to angiogenesis/BBB changes; oligodendrogliomas show microglia signatures (CX3CR1, P2RY12/13). Astrocytomas harbor higher PD-1+ CD8+, TIM-3+ CD4+, and Tregs vs oligodendrogliomas; 1p/19q codeletion associates with lower immune infiltration and checkpoint expression.
  • Metabolic differences: IDH-wildtype gliomas are more glycolytic, acidic, and hypoxic; IDH-mutants have reduced HIF1α and angiogenesis; within IDH-mutants, astrocytomas may become more glycolytic than oligodendrogliomas.
  • Neuron–glioma communication: GBM forms glutamatergic synapses via calcium-permeable AMPA receptors, promoting invasion; neuroligin-3 cleaved by ADAM10 stimulates PI3K–mTOR; exRNAs (e.g., miR-10b) regulate proliferation/invasion.
  • Genetics: Oligodendroglioma (IDH-mut, 1p/19q-codeleted) often has TERT promoter (~96%), CIC (~62%), FUBP1 (~29%), NOTCH1 (~31%); Astrocytoma (IDH-mut) frequently shows ATRX loss (~87%), TP53 (~94%), CDKN2A/2B deletion (~10%); GBM (IDH-wt) commonly has TERT promoter (~70%), EGFR amplification (~40%), +7/−10 signature; H3K27 alterations define diffuse midline gliomas.
  • Survival: Oligodendroglioma mOS ~17 years (grade 2) and ~11 years (grade 3) versus ~8–9 years for IDH-mutant non-codeleted astrocytoma; non-canonical IDH mutations (e.g., IDH2, non-R132H) correlate with longer survival.
  • Therapeutic outlook: Checkpoint inhibitors have not improved outcomes in newly diagnosed GBM with methylated MGMT; promising avenues include AMPA antagonists, PARP inhibitor combinations, MEK inhibition in pediatric LGG, DRD2/ClpP targeting in H3-altered gliomas, CAR-T/M cell therapies (including GD2), dendritic cell and peptide vaccines, cytokine delivery strategies, and anti-angiogenic combinations.
Discussion

This review synthesizes how molecular classification, particularly IDH status and 1p/19q codeletion, aligns with distinct TME states that likely drive clinical behavior. IDH-mutant gliomas’ immune-quiescent, anti-angiogenic microenvironment contrasts with the inflamed, macrophage-rich, glycolytic, and hypoxic TME of IDH-wildtype GBM, explaining differences in aggressiveness and treatment responses. Within IDH-mutants, astrocytomas’ macrophage-predominant and more immunosuppressive lymphocyte milieu may account for relatively worse outcomes compared to oligodendrogliomas. Detailed mechanisms—such as 2-HG-mediated immune suppression and HIF1α inhibition—provide actionable hypotheses for therapy. The integration of neuronal and glial interactions, especially synaptic signaling and paracrine pathways in GBM, highlights additional TME-dependent vulnerabilities. Collectively, these insights support therapeutic strategies that modulate the TME, including immune interventions, targeting neuron–tumor communication, metabolic reprogramming, and anti-angiogenic and cytokine-based approaches.

Conclusion

Molecular profiling has clarified biologically and clinically meaningful subtypes of gliomas with distinct TMEs. IDH-mutant gliomas generally show reduced immune infiltration and angiogenesis, whereas IDH-wildtype GBM features an immunosuppressive but highly infiltrated, angiogenic, and glycolytic microenvironment with extensive intercellular communication. These differences inform the development of TME-targeting therapies. Early signals of efficacy are emerging for CAR-based cellular therapies, vaccines (including mutant IDH1), and novel combinations (e.g., PARP inhibitors, MEK inhibitors in select populations). Future research should refine TME-driven patient stratification, elucidate neuron–glioma and glia–tumor interactions in IDH-mutants, exploit metabolic–immune crosstalk, and optimize combinatorial regimens to overcome immune evasion.

Limitations

Most available data derive from high-grade gliomas, particularly IDH-wildtype GBM, with fewer comprehensive studies in IDH-mutant tumors and pilocytic astrocytoma. Neuron–tumor and glial interactions in IDH-mutated gliomas remain insufficiently characterized. Differences in study platforms (bulk vs single-cell) and limited functional validation constrain generalizability. As a narrative review, conclusions synthesize heterogeneous sources without primary experimental methods.

Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny