logo
ResearchBunny Logo
The unreliability of crackles: insights from a breath sound study using physicians and artificial intelligence

Medicine and Health

The unreliability of crackles: insights from a breath sound study using physicians and artificial intelligence

C. Huang, C. Chen, et al.

This prospective study reveals the reliability challenges of identifying crackles and wheezes in breath sounds, conducted by Chun-Hsiang Huang, Chi-Hsin Chen, Jing-Tong Tzeng, An-Yan Chang, Cheng-Yi Fan, Chih-Wei Sung, Chi-Chun Lee, and Edward Pei-Chuan Huang. While both physicians and AI performed well for wheezing, crackles proved less reliable, raising important questions for medical decision-making. Discover the intricacies of this fascinating research!

00:00
00:00
Playback language: English
Abstract
This prospective study investigated the reliability of identifying crackles and wheezes in breath sounds using both physicians and artificial intelligence (AI). 11,532 breath sound files were labeled by five physicians and six AI models. Doubtful labels were re-evaluated by two additional physicians. While both physicians and AI showed good sensitivity and specificity for wheezing, crackles demonstrated good sensitivity but poor specificity, indicating their unreliability for medical decision-making. Further investigation into the challenges of crackle identification is warranted.
Publisher
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
Published On
Oct 15, 2024
Authors
Chun-Hsiang Huang, Chi-Hsin Chen, Jing-Tong Tzeng, An-Yan Chang, Cheng-Yi Fan, Chih-Wei Sung, Chi-Chun Lee, Edward Pei-Chuan Huang
Tags
breath sounds
crackles
wheezes
physicians
artificial intelligence
sensitivity
specificity
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny