This in vitro study compared the amount of remaining cement excess after cementation of implant-supported zirconia crowns using zinc phosphate (ZNPH) or calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement (CAGIC). Twenty zirconia crowns were cemented; ten with each cement type. Remaining cement excess was measured using pixel area calculation and weighing. ZNPH had significantly greater remaining cement excess than CAGIC (p=0.002 for pixels, p=0.005 for weight). CAGIC may be a more suitable cement for implant restorations to reduce peri-implant disease risk.
Publisher
BDJ Open
Published On
Jan 28, 2021
Authors
Jazmin Hidalgo, Desirée Baghernejad, Anders Falk, Christel Larsson
Tags
implant-supported
zirconia crowns
zinc phosphate
calcium aluminate glass ionomer cement
cement excess
peri-implant disease
in vitro study
Related Publications
Explore these studies to deepen your understanding of the subject.
