This paper explores the consequences of the lack of a clear definition of hybrid threats, focusing on the work of NATO and the EU in addressing these evolving threats in the grey zone. It examines the differences in how democratic and authoritarian states operate in this grey zone, analyzes the legal framework's suitability for countering hybrid threats, and considers the role of the European Convention on Human Rights and the challenges of attributing responsibility for these threats.
Publisher
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Published On
Jun 29, 2023
Authors
Susana Sanz-Caballero
Tags
hybrid threats
NATO
EU
grey zone
democratic states
authoritarian states
European Convention on Human Rights
Related Publications
Explore these studies to deepen your understanding of the subject.
