Social Work

Peer reviewers' dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

G. Vallée-tourangeau, A. Wheelock, et al.

This study, conducted by Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau, Ana Wheelock, Tushna Vandrevala, and Priscilla Harries, delves into the complex decision-making process of peer reviewers in the medical humanities and social sciences. Through interviews, it uncovers five critical dilemmas that shape their evaluations, revealing the unique perspectives each reviewer brings to the table.

00:00

Playback language: English

Related Publications

Explore these studies to deepen your understanding of the subject.

Medicine and Health

A Comparative Analysis on the Social Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage in Fragile and Conflict Affected Settings and Non-fragile and Conflict Affected Settings

S. Pattanshetty, M. Pardesi, et al.

Psychology

The aftermath of war; mental health, substance use and their correlates with social support and resilience among adolescents in a post-conflict region of Sri Lanka

L. Dissanayake, S. Jabir, et al.

Medicine and Health

Social Networks Play a Complex Role in HIV Prevention Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, and the Uptake of PrEP Through Transgender Women Communities Centered Around Three "Casas Trans" in Lima, Peru: A Qualitative Study

T. Temelkovska, K. Moriarty, et al.

Medicine and Health

Impact of Facebook on Social Support and Emotional Wellbeing in Perinatal Women during Three Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico: A Descriptive Qualitative Study

M. A. Lara, L. Navarrete, et al.

Listen, Learn & Level Up

Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.

No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.

listen to research audio papers with researchbunny