This paper challenges the notion that human capital is the most crucial factor in scientific advancement, a claim made by Clarivate Analytics. Analyzing data from Clarivate Analytics' 2018 database of highly cited researchers, the authors find significant biases related to language, gender, funding, and research facilities. The highly cited scholar profile is overwhelmingly male, predominantly from very highly developed English-speaking countries, and largely affiliated with institutions in those same countries. This skewed representation suggests that these factors, rather than solely human capital, significantly influence the prominence of researchers and the development of scientific knowledge. The authors advocate for search engine algorithm adjustments to increase the visibility of scholars from underrepresented groups, thereby enhancing the validity of scientific inquiry.
Publisher
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published On
Jul 08, 2020
Authors
Laura Sinay, Rodney William Carter, Maria Cristina Fogliatti de Sinay
Tags
human capital
scientific advancement
biases
research visibility
underrepresented scholars
gender
language
Related Publications
Explore these studies to deepen your understanding of the subject.