This essay examines the impact of the public-private distinction on digital data infrastructures, particularly in healthcare. It analyzes how the terms 'public' and 'private' are used informationally (what is shared vs. secret) and institutionally (state-owned vs. private ownership). The essay introduces the concept of 'data promiscuity,' where data's uses are indiscriminate, potentially jeopardizing individual privacy. Using Denmark as a case study, it unpacks how the public-private distinction shaped data infrastructures and proposes moving beyond solutions based solely on this distinction to ensure social sustainability.
Publisher
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Published On
Jul 16, 2020
Authors
Klaus Hoeyer
Tags
public-private distinction
digital data infrastructures
healthcare data
data promiscuity
individual privacy
social sustainability
Denmark
Related Publications
Explore these studies to deepen your understanding of the subject.