Updating beliefs about climate change is crucial for behavioral change. Metacognition—insight into the accuracy of one's beliefs—influences belief polarization. This study investigated the role of domain-general and domain-specific metacognition in updating climate change beliefs across varying levels of skepticism, considering textual and visuo-textual communication. Two large US samples (Study 1: n=364; Study 2: n=335) completed a perceptual decision-making task (assessing domain-general metacognition) and a belief-updating task (exposed to good/bad news about climate change). Results showed that climate change skepticism correlates with differences in domain-general and domain-specific metacognitive abilities. Lower domain-general metacognition decreased belief updating, especially with negative evidence. The study highlights the role of metacognitive failures in maintaining erroneous climate change beliefs.
Publisher
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published On
Feb 04, 2023
Authors
Sophie De Beukelaer, Neza Vehar, Max Rollwage, Stephen M. Fleming, Manos Tsakiris
Tags
climate change
belief updating
metacognition
skepticism
communication
perceptual decision-making
Related Publications
Explore these studies to deepen your understanding of the subject.