logo
ResearchBunny Logo
Behavioral consequences of second-person pronouns in written communications between authors and reviewers of scientific papers

Business

Behavioral consequences of second-person pronouns in written communications between authors and reviewers of scientific papers

Z. Sun, C. C. Cao, et al.

This intriguing research by Zhuanlan Sun and colleagues reveals how using second-person pronouns like 'you' can significantly enhance the peer review process of scientific papers, leading to fewer questions and more positive interactions. Discover how a simple word choice can transform academic communication!

00:00
00:00
Playback language: English
Abstract
This research investigates the impact of second-person pronoun usage on the peer review process of scientific papers. Analyzing 25,679 instances of peer review correspondence with *Nature Communications*, the study finds that authors using second-person pronouns (like "you") receive fewer questions, shorter responses, and more positive feedback from reviewers. This effect is attributed to the more personal and engaging conversation created by "you" usage, supported by further analyses and a behavioral experiment.
Publisher
Nature Communications
Published On
Jan 02, 2024
Authors
Zhuanlan Sun, C. Clark Cao, Sheng Liu, Yiwei Li, Chao Ma
Tags
second-person pronouns
peer review
scientific papers
communication
reviewer feedback
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny