logo
ResearchBunny Logo
The fingerprints of misinformation: how deceptive content differs from reliable sources in terms of cognitive effort and appeal to emotions

Social Work

The fingerprints of misinformation: how deceptive content differs from reliable sources in terms of cognitive effort and appeal to emotions

C. Carrasco-farré

This exciting research conducted by Carlos Carrasco-Farré examines the intriguing differences between misinformation and factual news across a vast collection of articles. Discover how misinformation captivates with its emotional appeal and simplicity, shedding light on the importance of understanding its varied characteristics.

00:00
00:00
Playback language: English
Abstract
This paper explores the characteristics of misinformation content compared to factual news, analyzing 92,112 news articles across seven categories: clickbait, conspiracy theories, fake news, hate speech, junk science, rumors, and factual news. Misinformation was found to be, on average, easier to process cognitively (simpler grammar and less lexically diverse) and more emotionally evocative (more negative sentiment and stronger appeal to morality) than factual news. The study highlights the need for more nuanced research into misinformation, as its characteristics vary significantly across categories.
Publisher
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Published On
May 09, 2022
Authors
Carlos Carrasco-Farré
Tags
misinformation
factual news
cognitive processing
emotional appeal
news categories
clickbait
rumors
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny