logo
ResearchBunny Logo
Reliability and accuracy of artificial intelligence ChatGPT in providing information on ophthalmic diseases and management to patients

Medicine and Health

Reliability and accuracy of artificial intelligence ChatGPT in providing information on ophthalmic diseases and management to patients

F. Cappellani, K. R. Card, et al.

This study evaluated the accuracy of ophthalmic information provided by ChatGPT version 3.5, revealing a mix of promising insights and potential dangers. Researchers Francesco Cappellani, Kevin R. Card, Carol L. Shields, Jose S. Pulido, and Julia A. Haller discovered that while 77.5% of responses were acceptable, a significant portion provided incomplete or harmful information, emphasizing the critical need for human oversight in medical contexts.

00:00
00:00
Playback language: English
Abstract
This study assessed the accuracy of ophthalmic information provided by ChatGPT version 3.5. Five diseases from eight ophthalmology subspecialties were evaluated using three questions per disease (definition, diagnosis, treatment). Responses were graded (-3 to 2) against American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) guidelines. 77.5% of the 120 questions scored ≥1, but 22.5% scored ≤-1, with 7.5% scoring -3 (potentially harmful). While ChatGPT showed promise, it provided incomplete, incorrect, and potentially dangerous information, highlighting the need for human medical supervision.
Publisher
Eye
Published On
Authors
Francesco Cappellani, Kevin R. Card, Carol L. Shields, Jose S. Pulido, Julia A. Haller
Tags
Ophthalmology
ChatGPT
Medical Accuracy
AI Evaluation
Human Supervision
Medical Information
Subspecialties
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny