This paper addresses Challenge 3 of the 2022 NIST additive manufacturing benchmark, predicting solid cooling rate, liquid cooling rate, time above melt, and melt pool geometry for IN718 laser powder bed fusion. An in-house AM-CFD code with a cylindrical heat source is calibrated using a HOPGD-based surrogate model and a keyhole formation scaling law. The calibrated model quantitatively agrees with NIST measurements for various process conditions, and a further improved physics-guided heat source model shows enhanced predictions, particularly at higher volumetric energy densities. The study highlights the importance of appropriate heat source parameterization for accurate predictions while reducing computational cost.
Publisher
npj Computational Materials
Published On
Jan 01, 2024
Authors
Abdullah Al Amin, Yangfan Li, Ye Lu, Xiaoyu Xie, Zhengtao Gan, Satyajit Mojumder, Gregory J. Wagner
Tags
additive manufacturing
IN718
laser powder bed fusion
cooling rate
melt pool geometry
heat source parameterization
NIST measurements
Related Publications
Explore these studies to deepen your understanding of the subject.