logo
ResearchBunny Logo
Abstract
This paper addresses Challenge 3 of the 2022 NIST additive manufacturing benchmark, predicting solid cooling rate, liquid cooling rate, time above melt, and melt pool geometry for IN718 laser powder bed fusion. An in-house AM-CFD code with a cylindrical heat source is calibrated using a HOPGD-based surrogate model and a keyhole formation scaling law. The calibrated model quantitatively agrees with NIST measurements for various process conditions, and a further improved physics-guided heat source model shows enhanced predictions, particularly at higher volumetric energy densities. The study highlights the importance of appropriate heat source parameterization for accurate predictions while reducing computational cost.
Publisher
npj Computational Materials
Published On
Jan 01, 2024
Authors
Abdullah Al Amin, Yangfan Li, Ye Lu, Xiaoyu Xie, Zhengtao Gan, Satyajit Mojumder, Gregory J. Wagner
Tags
additive manufacturing
IN718
laser powder bed fusion
cooling rate
melt pool geometry
heat source parameterization
NIST measurements
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny