This study investigated whether twelve automated Natural Language Processing (NLP) markers could differentiate transcribed speech excerpts from subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis, first episode psychosis patients, and healthy controls. Several measures showed significant differences between groups, including semantic coherence, speech graph connectivity, and an 'on-topic' measure, which outperformed the related measure of tangentiality. Most NLP measures were weakly related, suggesting they provide complementary information. Speech generated from picture descriptions (Thematic Apperception Test) and a story re-telling task outperformed free speech, highlighting the importance of speech generation method.
Publisher
Translational Psychiatry
Published On
Dec 13, 2021
Authors
Sarah E. Morgan, Kelly Diederen, Petra E. Vértes, Samantha H. Y. Ip, Bo Wang, Bethany Thompson, Arsime Demjaha, Andrea De Micheli, Dominic Oliver, Maria Liakata, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Tom J. Spencer, Philip McGuire
Tags
Natural Language Processing
psychosis
speech coherence
NLP markers
clinically high risk
first episode psychosis
semantic analysis
Related Publications
Explore these studies to deepen your understanding of the subject.