Mathematical biases in the calculation of the Living Planet | ResearchBunny

Index

Abstract

The Living Planet Index (LPI), a widely used measure of vertebrate population size changes, suggests a nearly 70% decline over 50 years. This contrasts with other studies using the same data, which show a balance between increasing and decreasing populations. This paper investigates the LPI's methodology, identifying several mathematical biases that overestimate population declines. These include weighting procedures, short time series, the GAM smoothing method, and the handling of zero population values. Modifications to improve LPI reliability are proposed.

Publisher

Nature Communications

Published On

Jun 21, 2024

Authors

Anna Toszogyova, Jan Smyčka, David Storch

Related Publications

Explore these studies to deepen your understanding of the subject.

Humanities

Walking in the shoes of others through brain-to-brain interfaces: a phenomenological approach to the generation of a collective living body

N. Liberati and D. Mykhailov

Environmental Studies and Forestry

Sailing to save the planet? Media-produced narratives of Greta Thunberg's trip to the UN Climate Summit in German print newspapers

L. Lütkes, L. Tuitjer, et al.

Business

Examination of HRM practices in relation to the retention of Chinese Gen Z employees

H. Ali, M. Li, et al.

Psychology

Unpredictable benefits of social information can lead to the evolution of individual differences in social learning

P. V. D. Berg, T. Vu, et al.

Listen, Learn & Level Up

Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.

No more digging through PDFs—just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.

listen to research audio papers with researchbunny