logo
ResearchBunny Logo
Mathematical biases in the calculation of the Living Planet Index lead to overestimation of vertebrate population decline

Biology

Mathematical biases in the calculation of the Living Planet Index lead to overestimation of vertebrate population decline

A. Toszogyova, J. Smyčka, et al.

A recent study by Anna Toszogyova, Jan Smyčka, and David Storch scrutinizes the methodology behind the Living Planet Index (LPI), revealing mathematical biases that lead to an alarming 70% overestimation of vertebrate population declines. Discover the proposed modifications that could enhance the reliability of this critical environmental measure.

00:00
00:00
Playback language: English
Abstract
The Living Planet Index (LPI), a widely used measure of vertebrate population size changes, suggests a nearly 70% decline over 50 years. This contrasts with other studies using the same data, which show a balance between increasing and decreasing populations. This paper investigates the LPI's methodology, identifying several mathematical biases that overestimate population declines. These include weighting procedures, short time series, the GAM smoothing method, and the handling of zero population values. Modifications to improve LPI reliability are proposed.
Publisher
Nature Communications
Published On
Jun 21, 2024
Authors
Anna Toszogyova, Jan Smyčka, David Storch
Tags
Living Planet Index
population decline
vertebrates
methodology
mathematical biases
ecology
population dynamics
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny