logo
ResearchBunny Logo
Extreme weather impacts do not improve conflict predictions in Africa

Political Science

Extreme weather impacts do not improve conflict predictions in Africa

S. Michelini, B. Šedová, et al.

This paper explores how extreme weather impacts relate to conflict forecasts in Africa. While such data offers insights, it turns out that socio-economic and conflict history indicators prevail as stronger predictors. The research was conducted by Sidney Michelini, Barbora Šedová, Jacob Schewe, and Katja Frieler.

00:00
00:00
Playback language: English
Abstract
This paper investigates whether detailed information on extreme weather impacts improves conflict forecasts in mainland Africa (1994-2012). Using the Generalized Random Forest (GRF) algorithm, the study integrates data on droughts, floods, crop production shocks, and tropical cyclones from ISIMIP2a into predictive models. While extreme weather impacts alone modestly predict violent conflicts, socio-economic and conflict history indicators remain stronger predictors. Adding extreme weather impact information does not improve forecast models including conflict history, governance, and socio-economic variables, partly due to spatial correlations between extreme weather and other conditions. The study concludes that extreme weather impacts lack unique information for forecasting annual conflict incidence in Africa.
Publisher
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published On
Aug 23, 2023
Authors
Sidney Michelini, Barbora Šedová, Jacob Schewe, Katja Frieler
Tags
extreme weather
conflict forecasts
Africa
socio-economic indicators
Generalized Random Forest
violent conflicts
climate impact
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny