This paper explores how grammatical choices (non/transactive construction, voice, mood) in terrorist discourse enact the act of othering, contributing to radicalization. Analyzing eight public statements by Osama bin Laden, the study identifies two types of othering: overt (using transactive construction, declarative mood, active voice) and covert (using non-transactive construction, various moods, passive voice). Overt othering foregrounds the negative agency of outgroups, while covert othering backgrounds it to emphasize immoral actions. The grammatical patterns reveal the strategic nature of bin Laden's verbal aggression, influencing audience perception and legitimizing violence.

Awni Etaywe