logo
ResearchBunny Logo
Current methodologies of greenspace exposure and mental health research—a scoping review

Environmental Studies and Forestry

Current methodologies of greenspace exposure and mental health research—a scoping review

J. Freymueller, H. Schmid, et al.

A scoping review of 338 studies maps the diverse methodologies linking greenspace and mental health, revealing 28 assessment pairings and uneven use of methods — from GIS mapping to self-report questionnaires. The research, conducted by Julius Freymueller, Hannah‑Lea Schmid, Ben Senkler, Susanne Lopez Lumbi, Stefan Zerbe, Claudia Hornberg, and Timothy McCall, highlights gaps, reporting inconsistencies, and the need for interdisciplinary approaches to design mentally healthy living environments.

00:00
00:00
~3 min • Beginner • English
Abstract
Introduction: Greenspaces can provide an important resource for human mental health. A growing body of literature investigates the interaction and the influence of diverse greenspace exposures. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the complex connection between greenspace and mental health, a variety of perspectives and methodological combinations are needed. The aim of this review is to assess the current methodologies researching greenspace and mental health. Methods: A scoping review was conducted. Four electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, Psycinfo, Web of Science) were searched for relevant studies. A wide range of greenspace and mental health keywords were included to provide a comprehensive representation of the body of research. Relevant information on publication characteristics, types of greenspaces, mental health outcomes, and measurements of greenspace exposure and mental health was extracted and assessed. Results: 338 studies were included. The included studies encompassed a multitude of methods, as well as outcomes for both greenspace and mental health. 28 combinations were found between seven categories each for greenspace and mental health assessment. Some pairings such as geoinformation systems for greenspace assessment and questionnaires investigating mental health were used much more frequently than others, implying possible research gaps. Furthermore, we identified problems and inconsistences in reporting of greenspace types and mental health outcomes. Discussion: The identified methodological variety is a potential for researching the complex connections between greenspace and mental health. Commonly used combinations can provide important insights. However, future research needs to emphasize other perspectives in order to understand how to create living environments with mental health benefits. For this purpose, interdisciplinary research is necessary.
Publisher
Frontiers in Public Health
Published On
Mar 05, 2024
Authors
Julius Freymueller, Hannah-Lea Schmid, Ben Senkler, Susanne Lopez Lumbi, Stefan Zerbe, Claudia Hornberg, Timothy McCall
Tags
greenspace exposure
mental health outcomes
scoping review
geoinformation systems (GIS)
questionnaire-based assessment
methodological diversity
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny