logo
ResearchBunny Logo
COVID-19 and science advice on the ‘Grand Stage’: the metadata and linguistic choices in a scientific advisory groups’ meeting minutes

Interdisciplinary Studies

COVID-19 and science advice on the ‘Grand Stage’: the metadata and linguistic choices in a scientific advisory groups’ meeting minutes

H. Baker, S. Concannon, et al.

This research insightfully explores the communication strategies of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) during the COVID-19 pandemic, revealing insights into transparency, expert plurality, and the nuances of scientific communication. Conducted by a team from the University of Cambridge and The Technical University of Munich, this analysis assesses key linguistic trends in SAGE's meeting minutes.

00:00
00:00
~3 min • Beginner • English
Abstract
Science advice for governments attracted great scrutiny during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the public spotlight on institutions and individual experts—putting science advice on the ‘Grand Stage’. A review of the academic literature identified transparency, a plurality of expertise, the science and policy ‘boundary’, and consensus whilst addressing uncertainty as key themes. The Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) has been the primary provider of coordinated scientific and technical advice to the UK Government during emergencies since 2009. Using the first 89 of SAGE’s meeting minutes (study period: 22 January 2020–13 May 2021), the ‘metadata’ and linguistic choices are analysed to identify how SAGE’s role and protocols are communicated. This includes understanding which experts were regularly taking part in discussions, the role of scientific experts in the science advisory system and their influence on policy choices, and the degree of consensus and uncertainty within this group of experts—all of which relate to the degree of transparency with the public. In addition, a temporal analysis examines how these practices, such as linguistically marking uncertainty, developed over the period studied. Linguistic markers indexing certainty and uncertainty increased, demonstrating a commitment to precise and accurate communication of the science, including ambiguities and the unknown. However, self-references to SAGE decreased over the period studied. The study highlights how linguistic analysis can be a useful approach for developing an understanding of science communication practices and scientific ambiguity. By considering how SAGE presents to those outside the process, the research calls attention to what remains ‘behind the scenes’ and consequently limits the public’s understanding of SAGE’s role in the COVID-19 response.
Publisher
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published On
Dec 24, 2022
Authors
Hannah Baker, Shauna Concannon, Matthias Meller, Katie Cohen, Alice Millington, Samuel Ward, Emily So
Tags
COVID-19
SAGE
communication strategies
transparency
science-policy boundary
linguistic analysis
uncertainty
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny