Automated decision-making in South Korea: a critical review of | ResearchBunny

Index

Abstract

This study analyzes the differences between South Korea's Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) and the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) regarding automated decisions, focusing on format, target, and content. The analysis reveals that PIPA lacks comprehensive safeguards compared to GDPR, particularly regarding the right to object, the regulation of multi-stage profiling systems, and the right to explanation. The authors propose legislative and interpretative remedies to address these shortcomings.

Publisher

HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS

Published On

Jul 29, 2024

Authors

Dong Hyeon Kim, Do Hyun Park

Related Publications

Explore these studies to deepen your understanding of the subject.

Medicine and Health

The experiences of adult patients, families, and healthcare professionals of CPR decision-making conversations in the United Kingdom: A qualitative systematic review

M. Hartanto, G. Moore, et al.

Medicine and Health

Politics of disease control in Africa and the critical role of global health diplomacy: A systematic review

V. K. Chattu, W. A. Knight, et al.

The Arts

Seeing disasters through the eyes of children: a critical reading of One Snowy Night and The Storm in the Barn through the lens of critical disaster studies

H. M. Bayoumy

Interdisciplinary Studies

Trapped in the prison of the mind: Notions of climate-induced (im)mobility decision-making and wellbeing from an urban informal settlement in Bangladesh

S. Ayeb-karlsson, D. Kniveton, et al.

Listen, Learn & Level Up

Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.

No more digging through PDFs—just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.

listen to research audio papers with researchbunny