PsychologyNature Communications
A comprehensive assessment of current methods for measuring metacognition
D. Rahnev
A comprehensive empirical assessment of 17 metacognition measures shows all are valid, most similarly precise, with weak links to response and metacognitive bias but strong dependence on task performance; split-half reliability is high while test-retest reliability is generally poor, suggesting no perfect metric and that different measures suit different contexts. Research conducted by Dobromir Rahnev.
Related Publications
Explore these studies to deepen your understanding
Adjacent work that informs or extends this paper's methodology and findings.
Psychology
A comprehensive assessment of current methods for measuring metacognition
D. Rahnev
Psychology
Neuroimaging the effects of smartphone (over-)use on brain function and structure—a review on the current state of MRI-based findings and a roadmap for future research
C. Montag and B. Becker
Biology
Neuroimaging the effects of smartphone (over-)use on brain function and structure-a review on the current state of MRI-based findings and a roadmap for future research
C. Montag and B. Becker
Environmental Studies and Forestry
A new scheme for low-carbon recycling of urban and rural organic waste based on carbon footprint assessment: A case study in China
K. Zhou, Y. Li, et al.
