logo
ResearchBunny Logo
Using the interest theory of rights and Hohfeldian taxonomy to address a gap in machine learning methods for legal document analysis

Computer Science

Using the interest theory of rights and Hohfeldian taxonomy to address a gap in machine learning methods for legal document analysis

A. Izzidien

This research conducted by Ahmed Izzidien explores the limitations of machine learning algorithms in legal document analysis, arguing that they fail to capture critical features like rights and duties. By incorporating the interest theory of rights and Hohfeldian taxonomy into stratified knowledge representation, it implements a groundbreaking heuristic that achieves a remarkable 92.5% accuracy in identifying essential relations within UK religious discrimination policy texts.

00:00
00:00
Playback language: English
Abstract
This paper argues that machine learning (ML) algorithms for legal document analysis are bottlenecked by not capturing essential features like rights and duties. It proposes using the interest theory of rights and Hohfeldian taxonomy to identify these features for stratified knowledge representation in ML. A novel heuristic based on philosophy and language models is implemented to identify Hohfeldian relations ('rights-duties' vs. 'privileges-no-rights'), achieving 92.5% accuracy using Sentence-BERT on UK religious discrimination policy texts.
Publisher
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published On
May 19, 2023
Authors
Ahmed Izzidien
Tags
machine learning
legal document analysis
rights and duties
Hohfeldian taxonomy
knowledge representation
Sentence-BERT
religious discrimination
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny