logo
ResearchBunny Logo
The ReHand-BCI trial: a randomized controlled trial of a brain-computer interface for upper extremity stroke neurorehabilitation

Medicine and Health

The ReHand-BCI trial: a randomized controlled trial of a brain-computer interface for upper extremity stroke neurorehabilitation

J. Cantillo-negrete, M. E. Rodríguez-garcía, et al.

A randomized trial of the ReHand-BCI—using a closed-loop robotic hand orthosis—showed meaningful upper-extremity gains and neuroplastic trends in stroke patients, with the experimental group improving on functional arm tests and showing ipsilesional cortical activity trends. Research was conducted by the authors listed in the Authors tag.

00:00
00:00
~3 min • Beginner • English
Abstract
Background: Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are a promising complementary therapy for stroke rehabilitation due to closed-loop feedback, but more evidence is needed on clinical and neuroplasticity effects. Methods: A randomized controlled trial compared ReHand-BCI (experimental group, EG) providing robotic hand orthosis feedback driven by motor intention with sham-BCI (control group, CG) where orthosis activation was random. Both groups received 30 sessions. Primary outcomes were Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Secondary outcomes included hemispheric dominance (EEG laterality coefficient, fMRI laterality index), white matter integrity (DTI ratio of fractional anisotropy), and corticospinal tract integrity/excitability (TMS). Results: Both groups showed significant within-group improvements in FMA-UE at post-treatment (EG baseline 24.5 [20, 36] to 28 [23, 43]; CG baseline 26 [16, 37.5] to 34 [17.3, 46.5]). Only EG showed significant ARAT improvement at post-treatment (EG baseline 8.5 [5, 26] to 20 [7, 36]; CG baseline 3 [1.8, 30.5] to 15 [2.5, 40.8]). EG exhibited trends toward more ipsilesional cortical activity and higher ipsilesional CST integrity, but these did not reach statistical significance versus CG, likely due to sample size. Conclusion: This trial assessed a broad set of physiological effects over a long BCI intervention, suggesting that more pronounced ipsilesional hemispheric dominance is associated with upper extremity motor recovery. Findings illuminate neuroplasticity effects of closed-loop BCI-based neurorehabilitation after stroke. Clinical trial registration: NCT04724824.
Publisher
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published On
Jun 18, 2025
Authors
Jessica Cantillo-Negrete, Martín Emiliano Rodríguez-García, Paul Carrillo-Mora, Oscar Arias-Carrión, Emmanuel Ortega-Robles, Marlene A. Galicia-Alvarado, Raquel Valdés-Cristerna, Ana G. Ramirez-Nava, Claudia Hernandez-Arenas, Jimena Quinzaños-Fresnedo, Ma. del Refugio Pacheco-Gallegos, Norma Marín-Arriaga, Ruben I. Carino-Escobar
Tags
brain-computer interface
stroke rehabilitation
neuroplasticity
ReHand-BCI
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE)
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny