Medicine and HealthJournal of Epidemiology
Should We Acknowledge ChatGPT as an Author?
A. Goto and K. Katanoda
This editorial by Atsushi Goto and Kota Katanoda explores the profound implications of AI chatbots in academic writing, particularly highlighting authorship issues. The findings reveal that while AI tools like ChatGPT offer potential, they should not be credited as authors due to their risk of factual inaccuracies and lack of accountability.
Related Publications
Explore these studies to deepen your understanding
Adjacent work that informs or extends this paper's methodology and findings.
Psychology
How should we approach negative news in the media? A 'mindful' and 'harmonious' consumption of negative news by users might be an answer
R. Shabahang and R. Weber
Education
Awareness of Artificial Intelligence as an Essential Digital Literacy: ChatGPT and Gen-AI in the Classroom
S. M. Bender
Computer Science
ChatGPT as Research Scientist: Probing GPT’s capabilities as a Research Librarian, Research Ethicist, Data Generator, and Data Predictor
S. A. Lehr, A. Caliskan, et al.
Linguistics and Languages
The effectiveness of ChatGPT as a lexical tool for English, compared with a bilingual dictionary and a monolingual learner's dictionary
R. Lew, B. Ptasznik, et al.
