logo
ResearchBunny Logo
Development and validation of anthropometric-based fat-mass prediction equations using air displacement plethysmography in Mexican infants

Medicine and Health

Development and validation of anthropometric-based fat-mass prediction equations using air displacement plethysmography in Mexican infants

A. M. Rodríguez-cano, O. Piña-ramírez, et al.

Discover how a team of researchers developed and validated new equations for predicting infant fat mass using simple anthropometric measurements, offering an accessible and cost-effective alternative for healthcare in Mexico. This innovative study conducted by Ameyalli M. Rodríguez-Cano and colleagues provides valuable insights for infant health assessment.

00:00
00:00
~3 min • Beginner • English
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Fat-mass (FM) assessment since birth using valid methodologies is crucial since excessive adiposity represents a risk factor for adverse metabolic outcomes. Aim: To develop infant FM prediction equations using anthropometry and validate them against air-displacement plethysmography (ADP). SUBJECTS/METHODS: Clinical, anthropometric (weight, length, body-mass index -BMI-, circumferences, and skinfolds), and FM (ADP) data were collected from healthy-term infants at 1 (n = 133), 3 (n = 105), and 6 (n = 101) months enrolled in the OBESO perinatal cohort (Mexico City). FM prediction models were developed in 3 steps: 1) Variable Selection (LASSO regression), 2) Model behavior evaluation (12-fold cross-validation, using Theil-Sen regressions), and 3) Final model evaluation (Bland-Altman plots, Deming regression). RESULTS: Relevant variables in the FM prediction models included BMI, circumferences (waist, thigh, and calf), and skinfolds (waist, triceps, subscapular, thigh, and calf). The R² of each model was 1 M: 0.54, 3 M: 0.69, 6 M: 0.63. Predicted FM showed high correlation values (r≥ 0.73, p < 0.001) with FM measured with ADP. There were no significant differences between predicted vs measured FM (1 M: 0.62 vs 0.6; 3 M: 1.2 vs 1.35; 6 M: 1.65 vs 1.76 kg; p > 0.05). Bias were: 1 M -0.021 (95%CI: -0.050 to 0.008), 3 M: 0.014 (95%CI: 0.090-0.195), 6 M: 0.108 (95%CI: 0.046-0.169). CONCLUSION: Anthropometry-based prediction equations are inexpensive and represent a more accessible method to estimate body composition. The proposed equations are useful for evaluating FM in Mexican infants.
Publisher
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published On
Apr 13, 2023
Authors
Ameyalli M. Rodríguez-Cano, Omar Piña-Ramírez, Carolina Rodríguez-Hernández, Jennifer Mier-Cabrera, Gicela Villalobos-Alcazar, Guadalupe Estrada-Gutierrez, Arturo Cardona-Pérez, Alejandra Coronado-Zarco, Otilia Perichart-Perera
Tags
infant fat mass
anthropometry
air-displacement plethysmography
LASSO regression
BMI
skinfolds
healthcare
Listen, Learn & Level Up
Over 10,000 hours of research content in 25+ fields, available in 12+ languages.
No more digging through PDFs, just hit play and absorb the world's latest research in your language, on your time.
listen to research audio papers with researchbunny